Ai Governance Frameworks: Nist, Iso 42001, Eu Ai Act & Oecd
Published 5/2026
MP4 | Video: h264, 1920x1080 | Audio: AAC, 44.1 KHz, 2 Ch
Language: English | Duration: 4h 15m | Size: 1.88 GB
Implement the right framework combination at your organizatation- templates, examples and the NovaCred case study
What you'll learn
Understand the four major AI governance frameworks - NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, EU AI Act and OECD AI Principles - and what each one actually demands operationally
Select the right framework combination for your organisation based on regulatory context, maturity level, audience and business goals
Sequence your implementation across four phases - from values foundation through to legal compliance and external certification
Apply the NIST AI RMF four functions - GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE and MANAGE - to real AI systems using a structured risk register
Conduct an ISO 42001 gap analysis, score all 16 clauses and build a prioritised remediation roadmap toward certification
Classify AI systems under the EU AI Act risk tiers and identify all High-Risk obligations including human oversight, technical documentation and conformity asse
Operationalise the OECD AI Principles beyond a policy statement and reach Level 2 adoption with a functioning AI ethics review process
Use downloadable templates and the NovaCred FinTech case study to apply every framework to a real-world scenario immediately
Requirements
No prior knowledge of AI governance frameworks is required - the course builds from the ground up
A basic familiarity with how organisations manage risk, compliance or regulatory obligations will help but is not mandatory
No technical or engineering background needed - this course is designed for governance, risk and compliance professionals, not data scientists or developers
Description
This is the full course description that appears on your Udemy landing page. It needs to do three jobs simultaneously - hook the right buyer, explain what makes this course different, and convert the browser into a purchaser. Udemy recommends between 200 and 500 words. I will write it in HTML-friendly format since Udemy's description editor supports basic formatting.
AI Governance Frameworks: NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, EU AI Act
The problem every AI governance professional faces right now
Four frameworks. Four acronyms. One very confused boardroom.
NIST AI RMF. ISO 42001. EU AI Act. OECD AI Principles. If you have sat in an AI governance meeting recently, you have heard these names thrown around - often by people who have not read any of them in full.
The honest answer to "which framework should we use?" is: it depends. And nobody is teaching you exactly what it depends on.
This course does.
What makes this course different
Most AI governance courses explain what the frameworks say. This course teaches you what to do with them.
You will learn how to select the right framework combination for your organisation's specific context, how to sequence them across four implementation phases, and how to build AI governance that holds up - not just on paper, but under regulatory scrutiny and client due diligence.
Every module includes downloadable templates you can use immediately - an AI risk register, a gap analysis scoring sheet, an EU AI Act obligations checklist, an ethics policy mapping template, and a full sequencing roadmap.
And every template comes with a completed worked example. Not a blank page. A real example showing you exactly how to think through each framework applied to a real AI system.
The NovaCred case study
The course follows NovaCred - a Singapore-headquartered FinTech that discovered mid-deal that their credit scoring engine qualified as High-Risk under the EU AI Act. No conformity assessment. No technical documentation. No human oversight mechanism. German bank deal at risk.
Watch how NovaCred applied all four frameworks in sequence - OECD Principles as their values foundation, NIST AI RMF to build their risk register, ISO 42001 to achieve certification in 11 months, and EU AI Act to close all 12 High-Risk obligations. The deal closed. The certificate became a sales asset in every subsequent enterprise pitch.
Their story runs through every module. It is the most practical thing in the course.
Who built this course
This course was built by a Chief AI Officer with hands-on experience advising financial services firms across the UK, US, Singapore and UAE on AI governance implementation - covering NIST AI RMF readiness assessments, ISO 42001 implementations, and EU AI Act compliance programmes.
The content is practitioner-first. Not academic. Not theoretical. Built from real engagements with real organisations facing real regulatory pressure.
This course is right for you if
You are in risk, compliance, legal, audit or AI practice and AI governance is landing on your desk. You need to understand the frameworks quickly, apply them confidently, and build governance that actually works.
Enrol now and have tools you can use by Monday morning.
Why this matters now
The EU AI Act High-Risk AI system obligations become enforceable in August 2026. ISO 42001-certified auditors are already scarce. The organisations building genuine governance capability today will face significantly lower costs and significantly stronger market positions when regulatory pressure peaks.
The time to start is now.
Who this course is for
Risk and compliance professionals who are being asked to take on AI governance responsibilities and need a structured, practitioner-level understanding of the major frameworks
AI practitioners, product managers and technology leaders who need to understand what governance frameworks their organisation must comply with and how to implement them
Legal, audit and regulatory professionals navigating the EU AI Act, ISO 42001 or NIST AI RMF on behalf of clients or their own organisations
Consultants and advisers in financial services, healthcare or enterprise technology who need to speak the language of AI governance credibly in client engagements
Anyone preparing for AI governance certifications such as the IAPP AIGP or ISO 42001 Lead Implementer who wants practitioner-level framework fluency before sitting the exam
