AgentofHeart
MyBoerse.bz Pro Member
pdf | 2.49 MB | Autor: David Merritt | English |B084SDVMZC | 2020 |
Category : Particle Physics, Physics
.: NFO:. :
-
Regeln für den Dokumente-Bereich:
In den Börsenbereich gehören nur Angebote die bereits den Allgemeinen Regeln entsprechen.
Allgemeines:
Nicht erlaubt im Dokumente-Bereich sind:
- indizierte Titel (inkl. Comics)
- extremistische Werke, Zeitschriften und Comics (egal, welche Richtung)
- jegliche Art von Pornographie
- Anleitungen zu kriminellen Handlungen, gleich welcher Art
- sadistische, menschenverachtende oder ähnliche Werke
Nutzt den "Bedanken"-Button, bei Sammelthreads führen jegliche Kommentare, positiv wie negativ, sehr schnell zu einer Unübersichtlichkeit des Threads. Downmeldungen sind an den Uploader zu richten
Vor dem Einstellen zu beachten:
- Suchfunktion
Vergewissert euch, dass es euer Dokument noch nicht im Board gibt, Doppelposts werden kommentarlos gelöscht. Ist es schon vorhanden, tragt es als Mirror im bestehenden Post ein.
- Threadtitel
Idealerweise ist sofort zu erkennen um was es sich handelt. Verseht euren Titel mit den relevanten Informationen, das hilft euch und damit auch uns und allen Suchenden erheblich weiter.
Beispiel: [Thriller] Dan Brown - Inferno oder bei Magazinen:
Computerbild - 14/2014 (es muss ersichtlich sein, um welche Ausgabe und welches Magazin es sich handelt)
Folgende Präfixe stehen im Unterforum "Unterhaltung" zur Verfügung:
[Humor]
[Drama]
[Erotik]
[Fantasy]
[Krimi]
[Roman]
[Thriller]
[Horror]
[Science Fiction]
Inhalt des Beitrags:
Folgende Pflichtangaben gilt es einzuhalten:
- Autor
- Titel
- Präfix
- Cover
- Genre
- Inhaltsbeschreibung
- enthaltene Formate
- Gesamtgröße des Downloads
- Hoster
- ggf. Passwort
Nicht erlaubt sind alle Dateien, die den Download unnötig aufblähen um eine Affiliategrenze zu erreichen, wie zB. mp3-files, übergroße Bilder, etc.
Ebenso nicht erlaubt sind sämtliche Dateien mit DRM, persönlichen Daten, etc., diese werden kommentarlos zu eurem eigenem Schutz gelöscht.
Achtet bitte bei der Konvertierung der Formate auf die Lesbarkeit, ein epub, was nur einfach durch Calibre gejagt wird um ein PDF zu erhalten, ist zu 99% eben nicht lesbar. Wenn ihr es nicht könnt, dann lasst es besser oder lest euch ein, wie man es richtig macht.
Unterforum Comics:
Threadtitel:
Ähnlich, wie bei Unterhaltung und Magazinen, sollte der Titel alle relevanten Informationen enthalten, hier bitte
- den Titel des Comics
- den Verlag (einige Comics sind in verschiedenen Verlagen erschienen)
- das Erscheinungsjahr
Erlaubt sind folgende Formate:
- CBR
- CBZ
Grundsätzlich gilt: jede Version eines Comics erhält einen eigenen Thread, Ersteller eines Comics können ihre Bände gerne mit dem Zusatz (Original-Release) versehen.
Bei Unsicherheiten zur korrekten Benennung bitte die Informationen von www.comicguide.de nutzen.
Inhalt des Beitrags:
Pflichtangaben hier sind:
- Titel des Bandes und ggf. Nummer
- Cover
- falls bekannt technische Daten (DPI, Breite, Speicherqualität)
- Größe des Downloads
- Hoster
- ggf. Passwort
- falls bekannt Releasenamen -
Bitte registriere dich zunächst um Beiträge zu verfassen und externe Links aufzurufen.
*** Bestes IPTV *** bester Preis *** gratis Test ***
A Philosophical Approach to MOND Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology - David Merritt
- Ersteller AgentofHeart
- Erstellt am
pdf | 2.49 MB | Autor: David Merritt | English |B084SDVMZC | 2020 |
Category : Particle Physics, Physics
.: NFO:. :
A Philosophical Approach to MOND: Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology By: David Merritt
A Philosophical Approach to MOND: Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology By: David Merritt | PDF | 2.50 MiB
April 30th 2020 | ISBN: 110849269X | English | 282 pages
Author: David Merritt
Dark matter is a fundamental component of the standard cosmological model, but in spite of four decades of increasingly sensitive searches, no-one has yet detected a single dark-matter particle in the laboratory. An alternative cosmological paradigm exists: MOND (MOdified Newtonian Dynamics). Observations explained in the standard model by postulating dark matter are explained in MOND by proposing a modification of Newton's laws of motion. Both MOND and the standard model have had successes and failures - but only MOND has repeatedly predicted observational facts in advance of their discovery. In this volume, David Merritt outlines why such predictions are considered by many philosophers of science to be the 'gold standard' when it comes to judging a theory's validity. In a world where the standard model receives most attention, the author applies criteria from the philosophy of science to assess, in a systematic way, the viability of this alternative cosmological paradigm.
(From the back cover
“This book gives a very careful analysis of the relation of theory to observational confirmation in astrophysics and cosmology, using as a case study the succession of MOND models proposed by Milgrom. Using Lakatos’s approach, which is contrasted with Popper’s proposals, the book focuses with exemplary clarity on the question of to what extent theories can be taken to be validated by observational tests. This is a great contribution to the philosophy of cosmology, which will also make the reader appreciate the strength of Milgrom’s theory in terms of having, in advance, made predictions which were subsequently confirmed.â€
GEORGE F. R. ELLIS, University of Cape Town
“Merritt’s take on dark matter is as thorough as it is illuminating. It is rare to find arguments so rigorous on both the scientific and philosophical sides, while still being eminently readable. This book will be insightful for practitioners in astrophysics as well for those wanting to understand what has been going on in astrophysics lately.â€
SABINE HOSSENFELDER, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies
“David Merritt, in an excellent well-written discussion, considers MOND, an alternative to dark matter, in terms of the ideas of Karl Popper and Imre Lakatos. In assessing a scientific theory, Popper emphasized falsification over verification, but in practice a theory may grow in content through a ‘research program.’ This growth is judged to be progressive if it successfully predicts new phenomena not related to those the theory was designed to explain. Merritt traces the MOND research program through various stages, pointing out numerous progressive successes. The point is that MOND is essentially predictive; the standard theory, dark matter, is essentially reactive.â€
ROBERT H. SANDERS, University of Groningen
File List:
Download ( Size: 2.50 MiB ):
Filehosts: Nitroflare, Rapidgator
1 Link/s
1 Link/s
A Philosophical Approach to MOND: Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology By: David Merritt | PDF | 2.50 MiB
April 30th 2020 | ISBN: 110849269X | English | 282 pages
Author: David Merritt
Dark matter is a fundamental component of the standard cosmological model, but in spite of four decades of increasingly sensitive searches, no-one has yet detected a single dark-matter particle in the laboratory. An alternative cosmological paradigm exists: MOND (MOdified Newtonian Dynamics). Observations explained in the standard model by postulating dark matter are explained in MOND by proposing a modification of Newton's laws of motion. Both MOND and the standard model have had successes and failures - but only MOND has repeatedly predicted observational facts in advance of their discovery. In this volume, David Merritt outlines why such predictions are considered by many philosophers of science to be the 'gold standard' when it comes to judging a theory's validity. In a world where the standard model receives most attention, the author applies criteria from the philosophy of science to assess, in a systematic way, the viability of this alternative cosmological paradigm.
(From the back cover
“This book gives a very careful analysis of the relation of theory to observational confirmation in astrophysics and cosmology, using as a case study the succession of MOND models proposed by Milgrom. Using Lakatos’s approach, which is contrasted with Popper’s proposals, the book focuses with exemplary clarity on the question of to what extent theories can be taken to be validated by observational tests. This is a great contribution to the philosophy of cosmology, which will also make the reader appreciate the strength of Milgrom’s theory in terms of having, in advance, made predictions which were subsequently confirmed.â€
GEORGE F. R. ELLIS, University of Cape Town
“Merritt’s take on dark matter is as thorough as it is illuminating. It is rare to find arguments so rigorous on both the scientific and philosophical sides, while still being eminently readable. This book will be insightful for practitioners in astrophysics as well for those wanting to understand what has been going on in astrophysics lately.â€
SABINE HOSSENFELDER, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies
“David Merritt, in an excellent well-written discussion, considers MOND, an alternative to dark matter, in terms of the ideas of Karl Popper and Imre Lakatos. In assessing a scientific theory, Popper emphasized falsification over verification, but in practice a theory may grow in content through a ‘research program.’ This growth is judged to be progressive if it successfully predicts new phenomena not related to those the theory was designed to explain. Merritt traces the MOND research program through various stages, pointing out numerous progressive successes. The point is that MOND is essentially predictive; the standard theory, dark matter, is essentially reactive.â€
ROBERT H. SANDERS, University of Groningen
File List:
Download ( Size: 2.50 MiB ):
Filehosts: Nitroflare, Rapidgator
1 Link/s
1 Link/s